Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Students Evaluating Teachers – Education Essay

Education Papers Icon

Students Evaluating Teachers – Education Essay
It is a general fact of education that more and more academic schools encourage students to evaluate and criticize teachers in order to improve the quality of

education. I agree insofar as it is beneficial for students to enhance the critical thinking, while others think that it will contribute to a loss of respect and discipline.

I concede that academic schools are on the correct side of this issue. After all, the quality of education is the final objective the schools pursue to. It is appropriate to assign to a high priority to the quality of education than to other accessory aspects, such as profit, enrollment. Moreover, this incentive spawns great advantage for the students, which is to enhance the capacity of independent thought, subjective judgement, emotional response, and so forth. Also, the teachers might benefit from these criticisms, which could help them to make possible universal access to their students’ information directly and accurately, and which could serve to put them more in touch with their foibles of teaching.

Nevertheless, we are doing more to it irrespective of whether this incentive is acme of perfection from all aspects, the disadvantages of which can be bifurcated into two parts. One is that it may affect the routine of teachers, for the compelling reason that the dogma of criticism might be received continuously by the teachers, who are less concentrated on teaching, and whose energy may be susceptible. Another is that more and more criticism from the students may do a disservice to the confidence of teachers and give them less respect and discipline.

To sum up, given above all reasons, there are considerable merits of both sides. What I suggest to do is make sure that while improving the quality of education, the academic schools should consider respect and discipline as the important factor, the function of which serve as important catalyst for adjusting both students and teachers’ behavior and facilitating the studying and teaching effectively and efficiently.