Machinal by Sophie Treadwell

Theater Category Icon

Editor’s Summary: This paper analyzes Sophie Treadwell’s 1928 play “Machinal,” focusing on themes of individual freedom, societal constraints, and feminine rebellion. Through an exploration of narrative structure, character development, and historical context, the study highlights the play’s enduring relevance. “Machinal” challenges traditional gender dynamics, critiquing societal expectations and the human cost of conformity.

Rebellion Against the Machine: An Analysis of Sophie Treadwell’s ‘Machinal’

Abstract

This article examines Sophie Treadwell’s 1928 play “Machinal,” exploring its themes of individual freedom, societal constraints, and feminine rebellion. By analyzing the play’s narrative structure, character development, and historical context, this study demonstrates how Treadwell’s work continues to resonate with contemporary audiences, offering a powerful critique of societal expectations and the human cost of conformity.

Sophie Treadwell's 'Machinal'
Sophie Treadwell’s ‘Machinal’

Introduction

In the annals of American theater, few works have captured the suffocating nature of societal expectations as poignantly as Sophie Treadwell’s “Machinal.” Written in 1928, this expressionist drama draws inspiration from the real-life murder trial of Ruth Snyder, using it as a springboard to explore broader themes of freedom, oppression, and rebellion. As we delve into the world of “Machinal,” we are confronted with a narrative that is at once deeply personal and universally resonant, challenging us to examine the machinery of society and our place within it.

The Mechanical World of “Machinal”

The title “Machinal,” derived from the French word for “mechanical” or “automatic,” serves as a potent metaphor for the play’s central themes. Treadwell presents a world where individuals, particularly women, are cogs in a vast societal machine, expected to perform their designated roles without question or deviation.

The protagonist, simply known as Young Woman, embodies this struggle against mechanization. Her journey from a reluctant bride to a desperate murderer is not merely a personal tragedy but a scathing indictment of a society that stifles individuality and autonomy. As we follow Young Woman’s descent into desperation, we are forced to confront uncomfortable questions about the nature of freedom and the cost of conformity.

The Suffocation of Expectations

One of the most striking aspects of “Machinal” is its portrayal of societal expectations as a form of suffocation. Young Woman’s loveless marriage, her unfulfilling job, and her role as a mother are all presented as constraints that slowly squeeze the life out of her. Treadwell’s use of staccato dialogue and repetitive scenes brilliantly conveys the monotony and claustrophobia of Young Woman’s existence.

Consider, for instance, the following exchange between Young Woman and her mother:

MOTHER: You can't go on like this - you've got to marry somebody.
YOUNG WOMAN: (faintly) Do I, Ma?
MOTHER: Of course you do - everybody does.

This simple dialogue encapsulates the crushing weight of societal norms, where marriage is not a choice but an inevitability, a predetermined step in the mechanical process of life.

Rebellion and Its Consequences

As the play progresses, Young Woman’s rebellion against these expectations becomes increasingly desperate. Her affair with George H. Jones represents a brief taste of freedom, a moment of genuine connection in a world of mechanical interactions. However, this rebellion comes at a terrible cost, ultimately leading to murder and her own demise.

Treadwell’s portrayal of Young Woman’s crime is particularly nuanced. While the murder is undoubtedly a horrific act, it is also presented as the inevitable result of a society that leaves no room for individual expression or desire. The playwright challenges us to see Young Woman not simply as a criminal, but as a victim of a system that has left her no other recourse.

The Relevance of “Machinal” Today

Despite being written nearly a century ago, “Machinal” continues to resonate with modern audiences. In an era where discussions about gender roles, societal pressures, and mental health are at the forefront of public discourse, Treadwell’s play feels remarkably prescient.

The struggles of Young Woman mirror the experiences of many individuals who feel trapped by societal expectations, whether related to career, family, or personal identity. The play’s critique of a society that values conformity over individual fulfillment remains as relevant today as it was in 1928.

Moreover, “Machinal” raises important questions about agency and responsibility. In a world where our choices are heavily influenced by societal norms and expectations, how do we define freedom? At what point does society’s role in shaping individual behavior become culpable in the actions of those individuals?

Conclusion

Sophie Treadwell’s “Machinal” stands as a powerful exploration of the human spirit’s resilience in the face of overwhelming societal pressure. Through its innovative structure, evocative language, and unflinching examination of its themes, the play continues to challenge and provoke audiences nearly a century after its premiere.

As we reflect on “Machinal,” we are reminded of the ongoing struggle between individual desire and societal expectations. The play serves as a stark warning about the consequences of a society that prioritizes conformity over personal fulfillment, and a poignant reminder of the importance of empathy and understanding in our interactions with others.

In the end, “Machinal” is more than just a play about a woman driven to murder. It is a mirror held up to society, reflecting our own complicity in the machinery of oppression. As we leave the theater, we are left with a profound question: In the face of such overwhelming pressure, how can we preserve our humanity and individuality? It is in grappling with this question that the true power of Treadwell’s work lies.

Work Cited

  1. Treadwell, Sophie. Machinal. 1928.
  2. Freud, Sigmund. The Interpretation of Dreams. 1900.
  3. Kristeva, Julia. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Columbia University Press, 1982.
  4. Clover, Carol J. Men, Women, and Chain Saws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film. Princeton University Press, 1992. Retrieved from https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691054389/men-women-and-chain-saws
  5. Williams, Linda. Hard Core: Power, Pleasure, and the “Frenzy of the Visible”. University of California Press, 1989.
Scroll to Top