Editor’s Notes: This article examines the powerful war poetry of Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon, focusing on how their works, including “Dulce et Decorum Est,” “Anthem for Doomed Youth,” and “The Hero,” expose the harsh realities of World War I. By using vivid imagery, irony, and emotional appeals, Owen and Sassoon critique the glorification of war, highlight the disconnect between public perception and the true horrors faced by soldiers, and emphasize the personal and societal impact of conflict. Their poetry remains a poignant reminder of the human cost of war and the importance of understanding the experiences of those who serve.
Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon, two of the most renowned poets of World War I, crafted powerful verses that exposed the brutal reality of warfare. Their poems, including Owen’s “Anthem for Doomed Youth” and “Dulce et Decorum Est,” and Sassoon’s “The Hero,” stand as testament to the ghastly and atrocious nature of world wars. These works argue that the men fighting in such conflicts deserve far more recognition and empathy than they often receive.
In “Dulce et Decorum Est,” Wilfred Owen presents his attitude towards war and his fellow soldiers with stark clarity and emotional intensity. The title, which translates to “it is sweet and right to die for your country,” initially suggests a pro-war stance. However, Owen’s clever use of irony becomes apparent as the poem unfolds, revealing his true feelings about the conflict.
Throughout the poem, Owen contradicts the sentiment expressed in the title, culminating in the powerful final line: “The old lie; Dulce et Decorum est pro patria mori.” This contradiction serves to emphasize Owen’s deep disdain for war and the propaganda that glorifies it. By framing the patriotic notion as “the old lie,” Owen strips away any romanticized notions of warfare, leaving readers with the stark reality of soldiers’ experiences.
Owen’s approach in this poem is particularly effective because it highlights the disconnect between those at home and those on the front lines. The sarcastic use of the Latin phrase underscores how little those “sitting in their armchairs at home” understood about the true nature of the conflict. Owen suggests that there was virtually no meaningful communication between the soldiers and civilians, leading to a dangerous misunderstanding of the war’s reality.
The vivid imagery Owen employs throughout the poem serves to construct a visceral picture of the soldiers’ suffering. He describes their physical and mental state in haunting detail: “Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge.” This powerful sentence creates a vivid image in the reader’s mind, helping to convey the terror and repulsive conditions that the soldiers endured. The use of simile in comparing the soldiers to “hags” emphasizes their premature aging and the toll the war has taken on their bodies and spirits.
Owen continues to build this imagery throughout the poem, describing the soldiers as “bent double, like old beggars under sacks” and “drunk with fatigue.” These descriptions not only paint a picture of physical exhaustion but also hint at the mental toll of constant warfare. The soldiers are reduced to almost inhuman states, stumbling through a nightmarish landscape of mud and gas.
The gas attack described in the middle of the poem serves as a pivotal moment, highlighting the sudden and arbitrary nature of death in warfare. Owen’s description of a soldier “drowning” in gas is particularly harrowing, emphasizing the helplessness and horror of such attacks. The poet’s use of direct address to the reader – “If you could hear… the blood / Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs” – forces the audience to confront the grim reality of warfare directly, making it impossible to maintain any illusions about the glory of combat.
In “Anthem for Doomed Youth,” Owen takes a different approach to critiquing the war. Instead of the visceral, immediate horror of “Dulce et Decorum Est,” this poem focuses on the broader tragedy of young lives lost. The poem’s structure, mimicking that of a sonnet traditionally used for love poetry, creates a stark contrast with its content. Owen subverts the expectations associated with the sonnet form to emphasize the waste and futility of war.
The opening line, “What passing-bells for these who die as cattle?” immediately sets a tone of anger and despair. The comparison of dying soldiers to slaughtered cattle emphasizes the impersonal, industrial nature of modern warfare. Owen goes on to contrast the lack of ceremony for fallen soldiers with the pomp and circumstance of traditional funerals, highlighting the disconnect between the reality of war deaths and the way they are perceived at home.
Siegfried Sassoon’s “The Hero” takes yet another approach to criticizing the war and its impact on soldiers and their families. The poem tells the story of a mother receiving news of her son’s death, believing him to have died heroically. However, the narrator knows the truth – that the soldier was a poor fighter who likely died in a less than glorious manner.
Sassoon’s poem highlights the gap between the public perception of war and its reality, much like Owen’s works. However, Sassoon focuses more on the personal impact of this disconnect, showing how the lies told about warfare affect individual families. The mother’s pride in her son’s “heroic” death is poignant and tragic, emphasizing how the myth of glorious warfare persists even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
All three poems share a common theme: the contrast between the public perception of war and its brutal reality. They challenge the notion of warfare as a noble or glorious endeavor, instead presenting it as a horrific experience that leaves deep scars on those who survive and cuts short the lives of many young men.
These poets, drawing from their own experiences in the trenches of World War I, sought to dispel the romanticized notions of warfare that persisted in society. Their works serve as powerful testaments to the true nature of combat and the deep physical and psychological toll it takes on soldiers.
In conclusion, the war poems of Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon stand as enduring critiques of warfare and its impact on individuals and society. Through vivid imagery, clever use of irony, and powerful emotional appeals, these poets challenge their readers to confront the reality of war and question the narratives that glorify it. Their works continue to resonate today, reminding us of the human cost of conflict and the importance of understanding the true experiences of those who fight in wars.
References
1. Davies, H. (2008). Text Messaging, Instant Messaging, and Picture Messaging Services. Computing in Today’s World, 34-42.
2. Podpora, M. C., & Ruiz, A. D. (2008). Advances in Wireless Internet Access Point Technology. Dallas: Wells Publishing.
3. Shelly, G. B., & Cashman, T. J. (2008). How GPS Works. Course Technology. Retrieved from How GPS Works.
4.Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. (2010). Sexual Harassment Definition. Retrieved from Merriam-Webster.
5.United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (2010). Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Retrieved from EEOC.
6.The Free Online Dictionary. (2010). Respondeat Superior. Retrieved from The Free Dictionary.
7. EEOC. (2010). Sexual Harassment Statistics and Resolutions. Retrieved from EEOC Statistics.
