Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

“Trafficking in Taiwan Aboriginal Music” Summary and Analysis – Music Paper

Music Paper Icon

“Trafficking in Taiwan Aboriginal Music” Summary and Analysis – Music Paper
In this article, Nancy Guy raises the issue on how artists from the First World use “exotic” material produced from indigenous world music but do not acknowledge their uses. Therefore the recording artists

are the ones who benefit and profit and not the original creators. Since there are no official copyright laws for international music there is an easier access for stealing music. In the U.S. there are strict copyright laws but only for music with an author and provide a physical copy. Given that through generations, indigenous music is usually passed down orally, there is no specific author or a “tangible” copy. Guy presents an example with the case between an artist from the U.S., Michael Cretu versus aboriginal singers from Amis tribe in Taiwan. In Cretu’s song, “Return of the Innocence” a large portion contains Ami singers’ voices but they were not recognized in any way. This resulted in the Ami singers suing Cretu and EMI recording company.

As stated in the article, the whole controversy could have been avoided if a few words recognizing the Ami music were printed on the album. Although it seems like common sense to recognize people’s work when you use it for your own purpose, sometimes it is forgotten. This issue is similar to today’s controversy of sharing music through the internet without compensating the music artists and recording companies. I feel that it is unethical to steal music but it depends on if the person is using it as his or her own music or just listening to it. These types of copyright issues are hard to solve but for now it should be left to the legal system.