Editor’s Summary: This essay critically examines the influence of Americanization on the British welfare system, arguing that it extends beyond mere policy transfer to reflect broader changes in global capitalism. It highlights the shift from a production-focused to a consumption-driven society, altering the role of the welfare state. Instead of simply supporting the unemployed, the welfare system now pushes individuals into any form of employment, mirroring American policies like workfare. This shift is part of a larger global trend where capitalism has transformed the relationship between work, welfare, and government policies.
Americanization and the British Welfare System: A Critical Analysis
Introduction
The idea of “Americanization” is often talked about as a type of policy transfer. Policy transfer means using knowledge about policies, institutions, and administrative arrangements from one place or time to develop similar things in another place or time. However, this essay argues that looking at Americanization this way misses some important points, especially when it comes to the British welfare system.
Instead of just copying policies, we’re actually seeing a big change in how capitalism works. We’ve moved from a society focused on producing things to one focused on consuming things. This shift has changed the role of the welfare state. In the past, the welfare state helped reduce unemployment. Now, unemployed people are seen as “flawed consumers,” and the welfare state doesn’t have a clear role anymore.
The Changing Role of Work and Welfare
In the past, work was seen as very important. It was how people defined themselves and their place in society. The welfare state played a big role in helping people find work and supporting them when they couldn’t work.
However, things have changed. Now, our society is more focused on consuming things than on making them. This has changed how we think about work and welfare. Here are some key changes:
- Work is now seen more as a way to make money to buy things, rather than as something valuable in itself.
- Jobs are less stable. People change jobs more often, and there are more part-time and temporary jobs.
- The welfare system now focuses more on getting people into any job, even if it’s low-paid, rather than on supporting people who can’t work.
The American Influence
Many of these changes in the British welfare system seem to come from American ideas. For example:
- The Child Support Agency, set up in 1993, was based on American policies. It was meant to make parents who don’t live with their children pay for their care, instead of the state paying.
- The “New Deal” policies of the Labour government in the late 1990s were similar to American “workfare” policies. These policies push people to take any job, even if it’s low-paid, rather than receive benefits.
- The idea of an “underclass” of people who don’t contribute to society also came from America.
The Bigger Picture: Global Capitalism
However, this essay argues that these changes aren’t just about Britain copying American policies. Instead, they’re part of a bigger change in how capitalism works around the world. Here are some key points:
- Big companies now have more power than many governments. They can move their business to wherever labor is cheapest.
- This means countries often feel forced to change their policies to attract businesses, even if this means reducing support for workers.
- In richer countries like Britain and America, there’s less need for workers because machines can do many jobs. This changes the role of the welfare state.
- Poorer countries are still in the “producer” phase, making things for richer countries to consume.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the changes in the British welfare system aren’t just about copying American policies. They’re part of a big shift in how capitalism works around the world. This shift has changed how we think about work, welfare, and the role of government.
The welfare state used to help reduce unemployment and support people who couldn’t work. Now, it’s more focused on pushing people into any job, even if it’s low-paid. This change isn’t just happening in Britain – it’s part of a global trend.
Understanding these changes as part of global capitalism, rather than just as “Americanisation,” helps us see the bigger picture. It shows us that these changes in welfare policy are connected to bigger economic and social changes happening all around the world.
Work Cited:
1. Dean, Hartley. Welfare, Work, and Poverty: Social Assistance in China. Oxford University Press, 2015.
2. Hudson, John. American Welfare State: How We Spend Nearly $1 Trillion a Year Fighting Poverty–and Fail. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2014.
3. Pierson, Paul. Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
4.Peck, Jamie, and Nik Theodore. “Exporting Workfare/Importing Welfare-to-Work: Exploring the Politics of Third Way Policy Transfer.” Political Geography, vol. 20, no. 5, 2001, pp. 453-490.
5. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press, 1990.
6.Dean, Mitchell. “Governing Societies: Political Perspectives on Domestic and International Rule.” Open University Press, 2007.
7. Taylor-Gooby, Peter. Reframing Social Citizenship. Oxford University Press, 2010.
8.Clarke, John, and Janet Newman. “The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare.” Sage Publications, 1997.
9.Klein, Jennifer. “For All These Rights: Business, Labor, and the Shaping of America’s Public-Private Welfare State.” Princeton University Press, 2003.
10. Jessop, Bob. “From Thatcherism to New Labour: Neo-Liberalism, Workfarism, and Labour Market Regulation.” Lancaster University, 2003. Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/sociology/research/publications/papers/jessop-from-thatcherism-to-new-labour.pdf
